Trees in Erlang
Like every man and his dog I've been playing around with erlang (and a smattering of Haskell for good measure :). I thought I'd try to see how I might write a binary tree implementation Erlang.
I must confess it turned out much less elegant than I thought it might - maybe some erlang or other functional gurus can point out a better algorithm. Now before you all comment, yes I know most of the below isn't tail recursive - but performance isn't really the issue here, and a binary tree implementation in erlang is going to be inefficient anyway if you're making frequent updates, since every recursion will involve copying some of the structure (maybe it optimises that away ... dunno enough about its internals to comment).
-module(tree). -export([find/2, tree_of_squares/1, insert/3]). -record(node, {key, val, left = nil, right = nil, height = 1}). %% find/1 find(SearchKey, Node) when SearchKey == Node#node.key -> {ok, Node#node.val}; find(_, nil) -> not_found; find(SearchKey, Node) when SearchKey < Node#node.key -> find(SearchKey, Node#node.left); find(SearchKey, Node) -> find(SearchKey, Node#node.right). %% tree_of_squares/1 : make a tree where key = val and contains %% squares of all numbers from 1 to Max tree_of_squares(Max) -> tree_of_squares(Max, nil). tree_of_squares(0, Tree) -> Tree; tree_of_squares(Max, Tree) -> insert(Max * Max, Max * Max, tree_of_squares(Max - 1, Tree)). %% insert/3 : return a new tree made from inserting (or updating) %% a node of Key, Val into existing tree or new tree (nil) insert(Key, Val, nil) -> #node{ key = Key, val = Val }; insert(Key, Val, Node) when Key == Node#node.key -> Node#node{ val = Val }; insert(Key, Val, Node) when Key < Node#node.key -> balance(Node#node{ left = insert(Key, Val, Node#node.left)}); insert(Key, Val, Node) -> balance(Node#node{ right = insert(Key, Val, Node#node.right)}). %% height/1 : return the height of the tree height(nil) -> 0; height(Node) when Node#node.left == nil, Node#node.right == nil -> 1; height(Node) -> height(1, Node#node.left, Node#node.right). height(Acc, Left, Right) when Left == nil; Right#node.height > Left#node.height -> Acc + Right#node.height; height(Acc, Left, _) -> Acc + Left#node.height. %% balance/1 : return a new tree which is the balanced version of Tree %% note also that balance is trusted to always return the root height set %% correctly balance(nil) -> nil; balance(Node) when Node#node.left == nil, Node#node.right == nil -> Node#node{ height = height(Node)}; balance(#node{ left = L, right = R} = Node) when L#node.height == R#node.height -> Node#node{ height = height(1, L, R)}; balance(#node{ left = L, right = R} = Node) when R == nil ; L#node.height + 1 > R#node.height -> swing_right(Node); balance(#node{ left = L, right = R} = Node) when L == nil ; R#node.height + 1 > L#node.height -> swing_left(Node). swing_left(#node{right = #node{ left = RL, right = RR } = Right} = Node) when RR == nil ; RR == nil, RL == nil ; RL#node.height > RR#node.height -> move_left(Node#node{right = move_right(Right)}); swing_left(Tree) -> move_left(Tree). swing_right(#node{left = #node{ left = LL, right = LR} = Left} = Node) when LL == nil ; LL == nil, LR == nil ; LR#node.height > LL#node.height -> move_right(Node#node{ left = move_left(Left)}); swing_right(Tree) -> move_right(Tree). move_left(Node) when Node == nil ; Node#node.left == nil, Node#node.right == nil -> Node; move_left(#node{ right = #node{ left = RL } = Right} = Node) -> OldRoot = Node#node{ right = RL }, NewRoot = Right#node{ left = OldRoot#node{ height = height(OldRoot)}}, NewRoot#node{ height = height(NewRoot) }. move_right(Node) when Node == nil ; Node#node.left == nil, Node#node.right == nil -> Node; move_right(#node{ left = #node{ right = LR } = Left } = Node) -> OldRoot = Node#node{ left = LR}, NewRoot = Left#node{ right = OldRoot#node{ height = height(OldRoot)}}, NewRoot#node{ height = height(NewRoot) }.tree_of_squares is just to easily create an interesting tree to play with, for instance:
1> c(tree). {ok,tree} 2> T = tree:tree_of_squares(7). {node,25, 25, {node,9, 9, {node,4,4,{node,1,1,nil,nil,1},nil,2}, {node,16,16,nil,nil,1}, 3}, {node,36,36,nil,{node,49,49,nil,nil,1},2}, 4}Then you can try to find a node: 3> tree:find(1, T). {ok,1} 4> tree:find(2, T). not_foundNot very interesting when the key = val - let's insert and update some entries: 5> T2 = tree:insert(5, bar, tree:insert(4, foo, T)). {node,25, 25, {node,9, 9, {node,4,foo,{node,1,1,nil,nil,1},{node,5,bar,nil,nil,1},2}, {node,16,16,nil,nil,1}, 3}, {node,36,36,nil,{node,49,49,nil,nil,1},2}, 4} 6> tree:find(5, T2). {ok,bar}Fun huh! An implementation of red-black trees is left as an exercise for the reader ;)
11:58 PM, 30 Nov 2007 by Mark Aufflick Permalink | Comments (2) |
Archive
November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 Notifications Request notifications
Recent Comments | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Request notifications