Clutter

As a software developer I consider myself aligned with creative workers like designers and architects. As such we have similar goals of solving problems with beauty and order (with a little randomness thrown in).
Perhaps as programmers we feel a little inferior or less developed as creative people because we (or I anyway) feel just ever so jealous each time we see a photo of a designer's desk—it's so beautifully neat, tidy, organised, and usually white (or perhaps light wood grain).
But most (not just a few) developers' desks are horrendously messy. Few dress *really* well and who wouldn't admit to a half empty coffee cup/coke can under their desk.
So that got me to thinking, perhaps there is a reason for this disparity.
The working representation of a designer's or architect's work is visual—something you can see, hold, spread out. Your eyes take it in and you form new ideas. Visual cleanliness and neutrality of their surroundings is probably essential.
The working representation of a developer, however, is the code. Occasionally the UI on the screen, but mostly the code. When a programmer is working hard, he is lost in the code itself—the stream of tokens (words), the imaginary mental model of associated objects, structures, relationships. Without getting all Matrix-y, the developer genuinely *sees* the program, and it is cleanliness and order in the code, the structure and these relationships in the program that are essential and the developer is temporarily oblivious to their surroundings (visual and auditory).
If you're not a developer yourself, just ask the spouse of one and you will find that the above is true (at least the being lost in something other than the world around them part :)
So if a good designer or architect may be respected for the way they refuse to give in to clutter, then good programmers should be respected for the way they insist on the right structure, or continually refactor, even when there might seem to be a quicker or cheaper way. Sometimes they may seem to be anal-retentive, but you will be grateful in the future when their creations stand the test of time.
Einstein Image via swissmiss.
08:27 AM, 16 Jan 2009 by Mark Aufflick Permalink | Comments (2)
Archive
| January 2009 | ||||||
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
| 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
| 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
| 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
| 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
March 2012
February 2012
November 2011
October 2011
April 2011
March 2011
January 2011
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
Blog Categories
software (40)..cocoa (21)
..heads up 'tunes (5)
..ruby (6)
..lisp (4)
..perl (4)
..openacs (1)
mac (21)
embedded (2)
..microprocessor (2)
..avr (1)
electronics (3)
design (1)
photography (26)
..black and white (6)
..A day in Sydney (18)
..The Daily Shoot (6)
food (2)
Book Review (2)
Notifications
Request notifications






